You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bioengineering: Doing without donors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/549s12a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elie Dolgin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,078,220
of 24,605,383 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#42,859
of 95,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,056
of 325,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#709
of 956 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,605,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 956 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.