↓ Skip to main content

Possible risk of overestimation of renal function using cystatin C-based eGFR in testicular cancer survivors treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Possible risk of overestimation of renal function using cystatin C-based eGFR in testicular cancer survivors treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10157-017-1474-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daishi Ichioka, Koji Kawai, Ken Tanaka, Ryutaro Ishitsuka, Takayuki Yoshino, Tomokazu Kimura, Shuya Kandori, Takashi Kawahara, Takahiro Kojima, Joichi Usui, Kunihiro Yamagata, Jun Miyazaki, Hiroyuki Nishiyama

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major long-term morbidity of testicular cancer (TC) survivors cured by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. We conducted the present study to elucidate the usefulness of cystatin-based estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRcys) for diagnosis of CKD compared to creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcreat) in those patients. eGFRcys and eGFRcreat were measured in 53 TC survivors. The 24-h creatinine clearance (CrCl) was measured in 12 TC survivors and 17 CKD patients with medical disease; all of them had eGFRcreat <60 m/min/1.73 m(2). Also, urinary beta2-microglobulin and albumin concentrations in spot urine specimens were measured. The mean eGFRcreat was significantly lower than eGFRcys, at 67.9 and 95.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively (p < 0.05). The prevalence of stage 3-5 CKD differed by GFR estimation methods. It was 47.2% with eGFRcreat and only 7.5% with eGFRcys. There were 21 patients with eGFRcreat <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and eGFRcys ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). In all 12 TC survivors, the eGFRcys values were higher than both eGFRcreat and GFR (24-h CrCl). In contrast, no difference was observed among eGFR values in the 17 patients with CKD due to medical disease. Ten of 21 patients with eGFRcreat <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and eGFRcys ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) showed significant beta2-microglobulinuria: a higher prevalence than that in patients with both eGFRs ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Also, the incidence of microalbuminuria tended to be high in those patients. The present study suggests that eGFRcys may overestimate renal function in TC survivors cured by cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Unspecified 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#21,186,729
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#643
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,186
of 322,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.