↓ Skip to main content

Haemophilus influenzae oral vaccination for preventing acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Haemophilus influenzae oral vaccination for preventing acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010010.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teo E, House H, Lockhart K, Purchuri SN, Pushparajah J, Cripps AW, van Driel ML

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Researcher 6 13%
Unspecified 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 56%
Unspecified 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Psychology 4 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,403,509
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,874
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,581
of 211,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.