↓ Skip to main content

Self‐management education for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self‐management education for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007641.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eileen Savage, Paul V Beirne, Muireann Ni Chroinin, Alistair Duff, Tony Fitzgerald, Dawn Farrell

Abstract

Self-management education may help patients with cystic fibrosis and their families to choose, monitor and adjust treatment requirements for their illness, and also to manage the effects of illness on their lives. Although self-management education interventions have been developed for cystic fibrosis, no previous systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness of these interventions has been conducted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 356 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 17%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 79 22%
Unknown 99 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 17%
Psychology 20 6%
Social Sciences 19 5%
Unspecified 11 3%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 116 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,743,590
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,949
of 12,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,750
of 247,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#203
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.