↓ Skip to main content

Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010191.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael McCaul, Andrit Lourens, Tamara Kredo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 20%
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 21%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 24 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,606,368
of 15,854,232 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,128
of 11,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,953
of 204,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,854,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.