↓ Skip to main content

30-year experience of Fontan surgery: single-centre’s data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
30-year experience of Fontan surgery: single-centre’s data
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13019-017-0634-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurynas Bezuska, Virgilijus Lebetkevicius, Rita Sudikiene, Daina Liekiene, Virgilijus Tarutis

Abstract

The Fontan procedure has been modified several times since it was introduced into practice in 1968. As many patients now survive to adulthood, attention is directed towards their clinical status and late morbidity. We report our surgical experience of 30 years in Fontan procedures. From January 1985 to January 2015, 80 patients underwent Fontan surgery. Twenty-one patients received an atrio-pulmonary Fontan (Group I), four patients underwent total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) with an intra-atrial lateral tunnel (Group II), six patients received extra-cardiac TCPC with an aortic homograft (group III) and 49 patients received extra-cardiac TCPC with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene conduit. They were followed for early and late mortality, long-term survival, postoperative morbidity and reoperations. The mean follow-up time was 7.4 ± 6.6 years. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 15-year survival rate was 42% in Group I, 50% in Group II, 83% in Group III and 94% in Group IV. The median length of stay in intensive care unit, intubation and chest drain stay time were 90 h (IQR, 46-119), 8 h (IQR, 6-16) and 18 days (IQR, 12-28) respectively. Early complications were bleeding (6), taken down of Fontan circulation (3) and acute heart failure managed by left heart bypass (1). Late-occurring morbidities included arrhythmias (6), protein-losing enteropathy (2), thromboembolism (2) and tracheal stenosis (1). Fourteen patients (18%) had redo Fontan procedures. Our series showed improving results after Fontan completion with excellent mid-term outcome after extra-cardiac TCPC with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene conduit. The long-term result should be followed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 50%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,448,386
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#933
of 1,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,400
of 317,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.