You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does a Caesarean section increase the time to a second live birth? A register-based cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Reproduction, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/humrep/deu217 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sinéad M. O'Neill, Ali S. Khashan, Tine B. Henriksen, Louise C. Kenny, Patricia M. Kearney, Preben B. Mortensen, Richard A. Greene, Esben Agerbo |
| Abstract |
Does a primary Caesarean section influence the rate of, and time to, subsequent live birth compared with vaginal delivery? |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 45% |
| Psychology | 6 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,061,613
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction
#2,603
of 6,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,261
of 245,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction
#25
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.