↓ Skip to main content

Does a Caesarean section increase the time to a second live birth? A register-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Human Reproduction, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does a Caesarean section increase the time to a second live birth? A register-based cohort study
Published in
Human Reproduction, September 2014
DOI 10.1093/humrep/deu217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sinéad M. O'Neill, Ali S. Khashan, Tine B. Henriksen, Louise C. Kenny, Patricia M. Kearney, Preben B. Mortensen, Richard A. Greene, Esben Agerbo

Abstract

Does a primary Caesarean section influence the rate of, and time to, subsequent live birth compared with vaginal delivery?

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 45%
Psychology 6 15%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,293,359
of 21,326,395 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction
#2,419
of 6,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,448
of 216,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction
#22
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,326,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.