↓ Skip to main content

Joint cross-correlation analysis reveals complex, time-dependent functional relationship between cortical neurons and arm electromyograms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Joint cross-correlation analysis reveals complex, time-dependent functional relationship between cortical neurons and arm electromyograms
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, September 2014
DOI 10.1152/jn.00031.2013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie Z Zhuang, Mikhail A Lebedev, Miguel A L Nicolelis

Abstract

Correlation between cortical activity and electromyographic (EMG) activity of limb muscles has long been a subject of neurophysiological studies, especially in terms of corticospinal connectivity. Interest in this issue has recently increased due to the development of brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) with output signals that mimic muscle force. For this study, three monkeys were implanted with multielectrode arrays in multiple cortical areas. One monkey performed self-timed touch pad presses, whereas the other two executed arm reaching movements. We analyzed the dynamic relationship between cortical neuronal activity and arm EMGs using a joint cross-correlation (JCC) analysis that evaluated trial-by-trial correlation as a function of time intervals within a trial. JCCs revealed transient correlations between the EMGs of multiple muscles and neural activity in motor, premotor and somatosensory cortical areas. Matching results were obtained using spike-triggered averages (STAs) corrected by subtracting trial-shuffled data. Compared to STAs, JCCs more readily revealed dynamical changes in cortico-EMG correlations. JCCs showed that correlation peaks often sharpened around movement times and broadened during delay intervals. Furthermore, JCC patterns were directionally selective for the arm reaching task. We propose that such highly dynamic, task dependent and distributed relationships between cortical activity and EMGs should be taken into consideration for future BMIs that generate EMG-like signals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 19%
Engineering 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#4,751
of 8,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,469
of 250,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#31
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.