You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seasonality Directs Contrasting Food Collection Behavior and Nutrient Regulation Strategies in Ants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0025407 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven C. Cook, Micky D. Eubanks, Roger E. Gold, Spencer T. Behmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,809,762
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#49,508
of 225,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,688
of 144,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#465
of 2,572 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,572 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.