↓ Skip to main content

Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002018.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Molyneaux, Louise M Howard, Helen R McGeown, Amar M Karia, Kylee Trevillion

Abstract

Postnatal depression is a common disorder that can have adverse short- and long-term effects on maternal morbidity, the new infant and the family as a whole. Treatment is often largely by social support and psychological interventions. It is not known whether antidepressants are an effective and safe choice for treatment of this disorder. This review was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of different antidepressants and to compare their effectiveness with other forms of treatment, placebo or treatment as usual. It is an update of a review first published in 2001.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 302 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 21%
Student > Bachelor 47 15%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 64 21%
Unknown 42 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 32%
Psychology 52 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 12%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 53 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#654,536
of 16,031,996 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,752
of 11,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,553
of 205,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,031,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.