↓ Skip to main content

Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006452.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quynh Doan, Paul Enarson, Niranjan Kissoon, Terry P Klassen, David W Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 317 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 16%
Researcher 33 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Other 23 7%
Other 66 21%
Unknown 89 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 112 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,785,256
of 25,380,192 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,866
of 12,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,819
of 257,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.