↓ Skip to main content

Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006452.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quynh Doan, Paul Enarson, Niranjan Kissoon, Terry P Klassen, David W Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 320 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 16%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Other 23 7%
Other 64 20%
Unknown 93 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 116 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,798,439
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,848
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,925
of 258,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.