You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving volcanic ash fragility functions through laboratory studies: example of surface transportation networks
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Volcanology, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13617-017-0066-5 |
Authors |
Daniel Mark Blake, Natalia Irma Deligne, Thomas McDonald Wilson, Grant Wilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 23% |
Researcher | 7 | 20% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 46% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,449,496
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Volcanology
#121
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,823
of 323,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Volcanology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.