↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogeochemical precursors

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Hydrogeochemical precursors
Published in
Nature Geoscience, September 2014
DOI 10.1038/ngeo2261
Authors

S. E. Ingebritsen, M. Manga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
France 1 3%
Antarctica 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Unknown 24 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 52%
Engineering 4 14%
Unspecified 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,771,808
of 9,067,901 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#1,767
of 2,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,612
of 194,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#56
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,067,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 57th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.