↓ Skip to main content

Community variations in population exposure to near-field tsunami hazards as a function of pedestrian travel time to safety

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community variations in population exposure to near-field tsunami hazards as a function of pedestrian travel time to safety
Published in
Natural Hazards, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0434-8
Authors

Nathan J. Wood, Mathew C. Schmidtlein

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 3%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 28%
Student > Master 13 21%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 28%
Environmental Science 14 23%
Engineering 11 18%
Social Sciences 11 18%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 5 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#10,935,154
of 12,338,222 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#860
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,181
of 217,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#34
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,338,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.