You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomized head to head trial of MoodSwings.net.au: An internet based self-help program for bipolar disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Affective Disorders, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sue Lauder, Andrea Chester, David Castle, Seetal Dodd, Emma Gliddon, Lesley Berk, James Chamberlain, Britt Klein, Monica Gilbert, David W Austin, Michael Berk |
| Abstract |
Adjunctive psychosocial interventions are efficacious in bipolar disorder, but their incorporation into routine management plans are often confounded by cost and access constraints. We report here a comparative evaluation of two online programs hosted on a single website (www.moodswings.net.au). A basic version, called MoodSwings (MS), contains psychoeducation material and asynchronous discussion boards; and a more interactive program, MoodSwings Plus (MS-Plus), combined the basic psychoeducation material and discussion boards with elements of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. These programs were evaluated in a head-to-head study design. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 375 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 66 | 17% |
| Unknown | 78 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 115 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 54 | 14% |
| Unknown | 87 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,751,555
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Affective Disorders
#1,073
of 10,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,798
of 262,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Affective Disorders
#12
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.