↓ Skip to main content

Clinical pathways for chronic cough in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical pathways for chronic cough in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006595.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabrielle B McCallum, Emily J Bailey, Peter S Morris, Anne B Chang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 113 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 22 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,341,758
of 14,546,774 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,756
of 11,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,792
of 207,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,546,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.