↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Stem Cell Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Stem Cell Protocols'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Short Primer in Stem Cell Biology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Measurement of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Proliferation, Self-Renewal, and Expansion Potential
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Measuring the aging process in stem cells.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Measuring the Potency of a Stem Cell Therapeutic
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Culturing Protocols for Human Multipotent Adult Stem Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Isolation of Murine Bone Marrow Scavenging Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Analysis of Circadian Rhythms in Embryonic Stem Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Measuring stem cell circadian rhythm.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Cryopreservation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: A General Protocol
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Biological Differences Between Native and Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Implications for Therapies
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Use of Multiparameter Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting to Characterize Native Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC)
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 High Yield Recovery of Equine Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Umbilical Cord Matrix/Wharton’s Jelly Using a Semi-automated Process
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Isolation and Functional Assessment of Cutaneous Stem Cells
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Isolation of Adult Stem Cell Populations from the Human Cornea
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Stem Cell Protocols
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Isolation and Characterization of Stem Cells in the Adult Mammalian Ovary
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Stem Cell Protocols
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Culture and characterization of mammary cancer stem cells in mammospheres.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Isolation and Culture of Primary Glioblastoma Cells from Human Tumor Specimens
Attention for Chapter 14: Isolation of Adult Stem Cell Populations from the Human Cornea
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Summary X Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Isolation of Adult Stem Cell Populations from the Human Cornea
Chapter number 14
Book title
Stem Cell Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1785-3_14
Pubmed ID
25388394
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1784-6, 978-1-4939-1785-3
Authors

Matthew J. Branch, Wing-Yan Yu, Carl Sheridan, Andrew Hopkinson, Branch MJ, Yu WY, Sheridan C, Hopkinson A, Branch, Matthew J., Yu, Wing-Yan, Sheridan, Carl, Hopkinson, Andrew

Abstract

Corneal blindness is a leading cause of vision loss globally. From a tissue engineering perspective, the cornea represents specific challenges in respect to isolating, stably expanding, banking, and effectively manipulating the various cell types required for effective corneal regeneration. The current research trend in this area focuses on a combined stem cell component with a biological or synthetic carrier or engineering scaffold. Corneal derived stem cells play an important role in such strategies as they represent an available supply of cells with specific abilities to further generate corneal cells in the long term. This chapter describes the isolation protocols of the epithelial stromal and endothelial stem cell populations.

View on publisher site
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
 Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,204,262
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,174
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,543
of 352,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#268
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.