You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of single and pairwise Toll-like receptor activation on neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12974-014-0166-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen Rosenberger, Katja Derkow, Paul Dembny, Christina Krüger, Eckart Schott, Seija Lehnardt |
| Abstract |
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) enable innate immune cells to respond to pathogen- and host-derived molecules. The central nervous system (CNS) exhibits most of the TLRs identified with predominant expression in microglia, the major immune cells of the brain. Although individual TLRs have been shown to contribute to CNS disorders, the consequences of multiple activated TLRs on the brain are unclear. We therefore systematically investigated and compared the impact of sole and pairwise TLR activation on CNS inflammation and injury. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,662,605
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,468
of 2,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,591
of 252,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.