↓ Skip to main content

Farmacologia no século XX: a ciência dos medicamentos a partir da análise do livro de Goodman e Gilman

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 905)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Farmacologia no século XX: a ciência dos medicamentos a partir da análise do livro de Goodman e Gilman
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, June 2013
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702013005000007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Cardoso Bittencourt, Sandra Caponi, Sônia Maluf

Abstract

This article analyzes the presentation of pharmacology as a science in the textbook by Louis Goodman and Alfred Gilman, updated and reprinted many times between 1941 and 2006. In the first editions, pharmacology was characterized as the science of drugs and related to other areas of knowledge; the history of drug development, the role of this science in its social context and its relationship with industry were stressed. In the following editions, these aspects were minimized, almost disappearing in the 11th (2006). The treatment of historical aspects may contribute to understanding the development of pharmacology, as well as the material on relationships with industry and society is important when reflecting on the criteria for using drugs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Postgraduate 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Chemistry 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 8 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,019,874
of 12,580,848 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#17
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,273
of 208,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,580,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.