↓ Skip to main content

Undergraduate dental sudents' perspectives about experiences in primary care for their education in the field of health

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Undergraduate dental sudents' perspectives about experiences in primary care for their education in the field of health
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2015
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015204.00812014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Augusto Thiene Leme, Antônio Carlos Pereira, Marcelo de Castro Meneghim, Fábio Luiz Mialhe

Abstract

Supervised training periods in primary care have been used as spaces for teaching and extension in the area of health, making it feasible to include undergraduates in concrete teaching-learning scenarios. The aim of this study was to analyze the perceptions of dental students about the importance of supervised training periods in Family Health Units to their professional education. The sample consisted of 185 students who answered the question: What is your opinion about the importance of this training period in SUS to your professional education? Comment on this experience and its positive and negative aspects The responses were analyzed by the quali-quantitative Collective Subject Discourse (CSD) technique. The students appreciated learning through practice in the service; contact with professionals from other areas; opportunity for technical-operative improvement and demonstrated sensitivity in the face of social reality, although they appeared to be concerned about being absent from the faculty, arguing that they were being prejudiced as regards their intramural clinical productivity, exhaustively demanded of them. It was concluded that students placed value on the extramural experience, however, it was perceived that there was still a predominant influence of focus on intramural clinical training.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2017.
All research outputs
#9,489,195
of 11,880,222 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#309
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,899
of 273,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,880,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.