You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two Cases of Foreign Rectal Body and Injury Associated with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons), January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.4030/jjcs.35.205 |
| Authors |
Toshinori Sueda, Masakazu Ikenaga, Masayoshi Yasui, Michihiko Miyazaki, Takuro Saito, Hideyuki Mishima, Motohiro Hirao, Kazumasa Fujitani, Shoji Nakamori, Toshimasa Tsujinaka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,925,445
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons)
#17
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,638
of 173,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.