You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Admixture in Latin America: Geographic Structure, Phenotypic Diversity and Self-Perception of Ancestry Based on 7,342 Individuals
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Genetics, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004572 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrés Ruiz-Linares, Kaustubh Adhikari, Victor Acuña-Alonzo, Mirsha Quinto-Sanchez, Claudia Jaramillo, William Arias, Macarena Fuentes, María Pizarro, Paola Everardo, Francisco de Avila, Jorge Gómez-Valdés, Paola León-Mimila, Tábita Hunemeier, Virginia Ramallo, Caio C. Silva de Cerqueira, Mari-Wyn Burley, Esra Konca, Marcelo Zagonel de Oliveira, Mauricio Roberto Veronez, Marta Rubio-Codina, Orazio Attanasio, Sahra Gibbon, Nicolas Ray, Carla Gallo, Giovanni Poletti, Javier Rosique, Lavinia Schuler-Faccini, Francisco M. Salzano, Maria-Cátira Bortolini, Samuel Canizales-Quinteros, Francisco Rothhammer, Gabriel Bedoya, David Balding, Rolando Gonzalez-José |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 11% |
Colombia | 7 | 8% |
Chile | 6 | 6% |
Brazil | 6 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
Mexico | 4 | 4% |
Peru | 2 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
Belarus | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 45 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 78 | 84% |
Scientists | 13 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 4 | <1% |
Colombia | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 426 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 80 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 17% |
Researcher | 51 | 12% |
Student > Master | 49 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
Other | 83 | 19% |
Unknown | 78 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 111 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 91 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 27 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 12 | 3% |
Other | 64 | 14% |
Unknown | 97 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#371,840
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#210
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,480
of 263,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#2
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.