↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
28 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011018.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Taylor, Anne‐Marie Glenny, Tanya Walsh, Paul Brocklehurst, Philip Riley, Rachel Gorodkin, Michael N Pemberton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 277 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Researcher 21 8%
Other 18 6%
Other 62 22%
Unknown 86 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 9%
Psychology 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 95 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,196,555
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,509
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,514
of 263,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.