↓ Skip to main content

How are biodiversity and dispersal of species affected by the management of roadsides? A systematic map

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
88 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How are biodiversity and dispersal of species affected by the management of roadsides? A systematic map
Published in
Environmental Evidence, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0103-1
Authors

Claes Bernes, James M. Bullock, Simon Jakobsson, Maj Rundlöf, Kris Verheyen, Regina Lindborg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 35%
Environmental Science 22 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#760,644
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#17
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,920
of 334,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them