You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Synthetic Biology of Proteins: Tuning GFPs Folding and Stability with Fluoroproline
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001680 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Steiner, Petra Hess, Jae Hyun Bae, Birgit Wiltschi, Luis Moroder, Nediljko Budisa |
Abstract |
Proline residues affect protein folding and stability via cis/trans isomerization of peptide bonds and by the C(gamma)-exo or -endo puckering of their pyrrolidine rings. Peptide bond conformation as well as puckering propensity can be manipulated by proper choice of ring substituents, e.g. C(gamma)-fluorination. Synthetic chemistry has routinely exploited ring-substituted proline analogs in order to change, modulate or control folding and stability of peptides. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 4% |
Germany | 2 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 121 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
Researcher | 27 | 20% |
Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 16% |
Chemistry | 20 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 20 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,625,700
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#62,852
of 194,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,354
of 79,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#111
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.