↓ Skip to main content

Repeated use of pre‐ and postcoital hormonal contraception for prevention of pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
30 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repeated use of pre‐ and postcoital hormonal contraception for prevention of pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007595.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vera Halpern, Elizabeth G Raymond, Laureen M Lopez

Abstract

Repeated use of postcoital hormonal contraception is not currently recommended due to the higher risk of side effects and lower contraceptive effectiveness compared to other modern methods of contraception. However, emerging evidence indicates renewed interest in a regular coitally-dependent method of oral contraception. We evaluated the existing data on safety and effectiveness of pericoital use of levonorgestrel and other hormonal drugs to prevent pregnancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 58 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 63 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,053,533
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,095
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,979
of 264,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.