↓ Skip to main content

Circadian Rhythm and Cartilage Extracellular Matrix Genes in Osseointegration: A Genome-Wide Screening of Implant Failure by Vitamin D Deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circadian Rhythm and Cartilage Extracellular Matrix Genes in Osseointegration: A Genome-Wide Screening of Implant Failure by Vitamin D Deficiency
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015848
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristiane Machado Mengatto, Federico Mussano, Yoshitomo Honda, Christopher S. Colwell, Ichiro Nishimura

Abstract

Successful dental and orthopedic implants require the establishment of an intimate association with bone tissue; however, the mechanistic explanation of how biological systems accomplish osseointegration is still incomplete. We sought to identify critical gene networks involved in osseointegration by exploring the implant failure model under vitamin D deficiency.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,237,640
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,336
of 194,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,715
of 181,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,163
of 1,230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.