You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
「精神障害(うつ)」と「高次脳機能障害」の脳形態画像・機能画像所見を比較する試み—MRI・SPECTを用いた頭部外傷後の症例における検討—
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2490/jjrmc.51.662 |
| Authors |
粳間 剛, 上出 杏里, 互 健二, 安保 雅博 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#88
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,185
of 272,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them