↓ Skip to main content

Centre‐based day care for children younger than five years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Centre‐based day care for children younger than five years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010543.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taylor W Brown, Felix C van Urk, Rebecca Waller, Evan Mayo‐Wilson

Abstract

Because of poverty, children and families in low- and middle-income countries often face significant impediments to health and well-being. Centre-based day care services may influence the development of children and the economic situation of parents by providing good quality early childhood care and by freeing parents to participate in the labour force.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 366 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 15%
Researcher 48 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 62 17%
Unknown 101 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 14%
Social Sciences 40 11%
Psychology 32 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 115 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,047,765
of 26,086,865 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,223
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,170
of 264,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,086,865 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.