↓ Skip to main content

What Influences the Types of Help that Problem Gamblers Choose? A Preliminary Grounded Theory Model

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Influences the Types of Help that Problem Gamblers Choose? A Preliminary Grounded Theory Model
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11469-014-9525-y
Authors

Nerilee Hing, Elaine Nuske, Barry Tolchard, Alex Russell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 34%
Social Sciences 14 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 9%
Decision Sciences 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 10 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,437,356
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction
#165
of 767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,056
of 217,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them