↓ Skip to main content

Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
69 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000035.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Jamie Kirkham, Kerry Dwan, Sharon Kramer, Sally Green, Andrew Forbes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 154 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 12 7%
Other 54 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 51%
Unspecified 19 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Psychology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 32 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#342,406
of 13,444,601 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#950
of 10,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,476
of 211,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,444,601 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.