↓ Skip to main content

3-D Seismic Imaging of Ancient Submarine Lava Flows: An Example From the Southern Australian Margin

Overview of attention for article published in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
3-D Seismic Imaging of Ancient Submarine Lava Flows: An Example From the Southern Australian Margin
Published in
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/2017gc007178
Authors

Reynolds, P., Holford, S., Schofield, N., Ross, A.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2017.
All research outputs
#668,659
of 8,530,102 outputs
Outputs from Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
#58
of 692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,084
of 128,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,530,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.