You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nanoparticle biofabrication using English ivy (Hedera helix)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-10-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason N Burris, Scott C Lenaghan, Mingjun Zhang, C Neal Stewart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 29% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2012.
All research outputs
#5,805,219
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#189
of 1,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,232
of 184,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them