↓ Skip to main content

Comparable outcome of liver transplantation with Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate vs. University of Wisconsin preservation solution: a retrospective observational double-center trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparable outcome of liver transplantation with Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate vs. University of Wisconsin preservation solution: a retrospective observational double-center trial
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-14-169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Kaltenborn, Jill Gwiasda, Volker Amelung, Christian Krauth, Frank Lehner, Felix Braun, Jürgen Klempnauer, Benedikt Reichert, Harald Schrem

Abstract

The question of whether the choice of preservation solution affects outcome after liver transplantation is still not satisfactorily answered. The purpose of this study is to examine the preservation solutions' impact on outcome after liver transplantation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,786,597
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#763
of 1,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,314
of 252,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.