You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dysphagia Management in Acute and Sub-acute Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40141-014-0061-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia Vose, Jodi Nonnenmacher, Michele L. Singer, Marlís González-Fernández |
| Abstract |
Swallowing dysfunction is common after stroke. More than 50% of the 665 thousand stroke survivors will experience dysphagia acutely of which approximately 80 thousand will experience persistent dysphagia at 6 months. The physiologic impairments that result in post-stroke dysphagia are varied. This review focuses primarily on well-established dysphagia treatments in the context of the physiologic impairments they treat. Traditional dysphagia therapies including volume and texture modifications, strategies such as chin tuck, head tilt, head turn, effortful swallow, supraglottic swallow, super-supraglottic swallow, Mendelsohn maneuver and exercises such as the Shaker exercise and Masako (tongue hold) maneuver are discussed. Other more recent treatment interventions are discussed in the context of the evidence available. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 17% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 65 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 19% |
| Linguistics | 8 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 71 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,942,701
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
#46
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,003
of 225,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them