↓ Skip to main content

Protein Molecular Function Prediction by Bayesian Phylogenomics

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
18 CiteULike
connotea
5 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein Molecular Function Prediction by Bayesian Phylogenomics
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2005
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara E Engelhardt, Michael I Jordan, Kathryn E Muratore, Steven E Brenner

Abstract

We present a statistical graphical model to infer specific molecular function for unannotated protein sequences using homology. Based on phylogenomic principles, SIFTER (Statistical Inference of Function Through Evolutionary Relationships) accurately predicts molecular function for members of a protein family given a reconciled phylogeny and available function annotations, even when the data are sparse or noisy. Our method produced specific and consistent molecular function predictions across 100 Pfam families in comparison to the Gene Ontology annotation database, BLAST, GOtcha, and Orthostrapper. We performed a more detailed exploration of functional predictions on the adenosine-5'-monophosphate/adenosine deaminase family and the lactate/malate dehydrogenase family, in the former case comparing the predictions against a gold standard set of published functional characterizations. Given function annotations for 3% of the proteins in the deaminase family, SIFTER achieves 96% accuracy in predicting molecular function for experimentally characterized proteins as reported in the literature. The accuracy of SIFTER on this dataset is a significant improvement over other currently available methods such as BLAST (75%), GeneQuiz (64%), GOtcha (89%), and Orthostrapper (11%). We also experimentally characterized the adenosine deaminase from Plasmodium falciparum, confirming SIFTER's prediction. The results illustrate the predictive power of exploiting a statistical model of function evolution in phylogenomic problems. A software implementation of SIFTER is available from the authors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 10%
Brazil 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 162 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 9%
Student > Master 16 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 13 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 13%
Computer Science 17 8%
Chemistry 6 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 17 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2009.
All research outputs
#6,566,944
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,441
of 9,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,613
of 72,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.