You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Incidence of Sarcoma Histotypes and Molecular Subtypes in a Prospective Epidemiological Study with Central Pathology Review and Molecular Testing
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0020294 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Françoise Ducimetière, Antoine Lurkin, Dominique Ranchère-Vince, Anne-Valérie Decouvelaere, Michel Péoc'h, Luc Istier, Philippe Chalabreysse, Christine Muller, Laurent Alberti, Pierre-Paul Bringuier, Jean-Yves Scoazec, Anne-Marie Schott, Christophe Bergeron, Dominic Cellier, Jean-Yves Blay, Isabelle Ray-Coquard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 189 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
Other | 17 | 9% |
Researcher | 17 | 9% |
Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
Other | 44 | 23% |
Unknown | 60 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 8% |
Unknown | 62 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#837,943
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,025
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,193
of 132,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#109
of 2,371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.