↓ Skip to main content

Financial Conflicts of Interest and Conclusions About Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Influenza

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Financial Conflicts of Interest and Conclusions About Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Influenza
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.7326/m14-0933
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam G. Dunn, Diana Arachi, Joel Hudgins, Guy Tsafnat, Enrico Coiera, Florence T. Bourgeois

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 12 25%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 42%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#140,993
of 15,566,445 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#691
of 11,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,035
of 212,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#10
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,566,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.