↓ Skip to main content

Financial Conflicts of Interest and Conclusions About Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Influenza: An Analysis of Systematic Reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
63 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Financial Conflicts of Interest and Conclusions About Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Influenza: An Analysis of Systematic Reviews
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.7326/m14-0933
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam G. Dunn, Diana Arachi, Joel Hudgins, Guy Tsafnat, Enrico Coiera, Florence T. Bourgeois, Dunn AG, Arachi D, Hudgins J, Tsafnat G, Coiera E, Bourgeois FT

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 27 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Unspecified 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 48%
Unspecified 6 19%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#91,900
of 12,340,937 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#479
of 10,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,884
of 216,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#11
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,340,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.