↓ Skip to main content

Oxygen consumption calorimetry, William Parker: 2016 DiNenno Prize

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Science Reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oxygen consumption calorimetry, William Parker: 2016 DiNenno Prize
Published in
Fire Science Reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40038-016-0016-z
Authors

C. Beyler, P. Croce, C. Dubay, P. Johnson, M. McNamee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 33%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 37%
Materials Science 3 10%
Chemistry 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,540,801
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Fire Science Reviews
#9
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,498
of 422,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Science Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them