You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Effects Have Resident Work-hour Changes Had on Education, Quality of Life, and Safety? A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-014-3968-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua D. Harris, Greg Staheli, Lance LeClere, Diana Andersone, Frank McCormick |
| Abstract |
More than 15 years ago, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified medical error as a problem worthy of greater attention; in the wake of the IOM report, numerous changes were made to regulations to limit residents' duty hours. However, the effect of resident work-hour changes remains controversial within the field of orthopaedics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,765,708
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#813
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,048
of 265,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#15
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.