↓ Skip to main content

A avaliação da produtividade científica

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 1,013)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A avaliação da produtividade científica
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, September 2017
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702017000300005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcos Antônio Mattedi, Maiko Rafael Spiess

Abstract

The paper examines the evaluation of scientific productivity. It analyzes the metrification of the evaluation of scientific production, as well as the historical construction, and current uses of scientific evaluation. It argues that this process contains a paradox: the more that metrics become impersonal, the less they are recognized by scientists. The study is divided into five sections: contextualization of the problematics of scientific evaluation; a description of the main stages in the institutionalization of metrification; an overview of the development of the main evaluation indexes; some examples of the application of these indexes; and analytical consequences and recommendations for the formulation of a new evaluation agenda.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Librarian 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 30%
Arts and Humanities 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Computer Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 8 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,241,069
of 13,090,275 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#38
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,853
of 310,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,090,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them