↓ Skip to main content

Early phytocannabinoid chemistry to endocannabinoids and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
278 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
672 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early phytocannabinoid chemistry to endocannabinoids and beyond
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, October 2014
DOI 10.1038/nrn3811
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Mechoulam, Lumír O. Hanuš, Roger Pertwee, Allyn C. Howlett

Abstract

Isolation and structure elucidation of most of the major cannabinoid constituents--including Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC), which is the principal psychoactive molecule in Cannabis sativa--was achieved in the 1960s and 1970s. It was followed by the identification of two cannabinoid receptors in the 1980s and the early 1990s and by the identification of the endocannabinoids shortly thereafter. There have since been considerable advances in our understanding of the endocannabinoid system and its function in the brain, which reveal potential therapeutic targets for a wide range of brain disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 672 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
Canada 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 647 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 16%
Student > Bachelor 91 14%
Student > Master 88 13%
Researcher 86 13%
Other 42 6%
Other 109 16%
Unknown 149 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 16%
Neuroscience 79 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 55 8%
Other 126 19%
Unknown 169 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#873,057
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#421
of 2,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,359
of 268,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#9
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.