You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Induction of Systemic Resistance against Insect Herbivores in Plants by Beneficial Soil Microbes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2017.01816 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harun-Or Rashid, Young R. Chung |
| Abstract |
Soil microorganisms with growth-promoting activities in plants, including rhizobacteria and rhizofungi, can improve plant health in a variety of different ways. These beneficial microbes may confer broad-spectrum resistance to insect herbivores. Here, we provide evidence that beneficial microbes modulate plant defenses against insect herbivores. Beneficial soil microorganisms can regulate hormone signaling including the jasmonic acid, ethylene and salicylic acid pathways, thereby leading to gene expression, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, plant defensive proteins and different enzymes and volatile compounds, that may induce defenses against leaf-chewing as well as phloem-feeding insects. In this review, we discuss how beneficial microbes trigger induced systemic resistance against insects by promoting plant growth and highlight changes in plant molecular mechanisms and biochemical profiles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 62 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 101 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 70 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,487,780
of 25,937,538 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,915
of 24,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,291
of 341,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#72
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,937,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,969 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.