↓ Skip to main content

Oral adsorbents for preventing or delaying the progression of chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral adsorbents for preventing or delaying the progression of chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007861.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Mei Wu, Hong Juan Sun, Feng Wang, Ming Yang, Bi Rong Dong, Guan J Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Unspecified 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 43%
Unspecified 21 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,509,618
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,039
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,873
of 212,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#192
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.