↓ Skip to main content

Beyond the evidence: treating pulmonary hypertension in the intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond the evidence: treating pulmonary hypertension in the intensive care unit
Published in
Critical Care, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0524-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth R Bauer, Adriano R Tonelli

Abstract

Most patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension succumb to their disease in the ICU; however, limited evidence-based information exists to guide treatment in those that present with advanced right ventricular failure. Critical care physicians should be aware of the complexities of the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and should develop a strategy for their care. Current management is based on the pathophysiology of the disease and involves a multidisciplinary team supported by institutional polices directed at optimizing patient safety.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 26%
Student > Postgraduate 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#4,177,100
of 8,701,761 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,368
of 3,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,296
of 198,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#104
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,701,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.