↓ Skip to main content

Oppositional COMT Val158Met effects on resting state functional connectivity in adolescents and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 2,044)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
27 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oppositional COMT Val158Met effects on resting state functional connectivity in adolescents and adults
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00429-014-0895-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernhard M. Meyer, Julia Huemer, Ulrich Rabl, Roland N. Boubela, Klaudius Kalcher, Andreas Berger, Tobias Banaschewski, Gareth Barker, Arun Bokde, Christian Büchel, Patricia Conrod, Sylvane Desrivières, Herta Flor, Vincent Frouin, Jurgen Gallinat, Hugh Garavan, Andreas Heinz, Bernd Ittermann, Tianye Jia, Mark Lathrop, Jean-Luc Martinot, Frauke Nees, Marcella Rietschel, Michael N. Smolka, Lucie Bartova, Ana Popovic, Christian Scharinger, Harald H. Sitte, Hans Steiner, Max H. Friedrich, Siegfried Kasper, Thomas Perkmann, Nicole Praschak-Rieder, Helmuth Haslacher, Harald Esterbauer, Ewald Moser, Gunter Schumann, Lukas Pezawas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 21%
Neuroscience 22 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#840,529
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#42
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,889
of 269,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.