You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum: Corrigendum: Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease: report from a multidisciplinary symposium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
npj Parkinson's Disease, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/npjparkd.2017.1 |
| Authors |
Joseph H Friedman, James C Beck, Kelvin L Chou, Gracia Clark, Christopher P Fagundes, Christopher G Goetz, Karen Herlofson, Benzi Kluger, Lauren B Krupp, Anthony E Lang, Jao-Shin Lou, Laura Marsh, Anne Newbould, Daniel Weintraub |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Argentina | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,481,888
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from npj Parkinson's Disease
#452
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,756
of 328,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Parkinson's Disease
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.