↓ Skip to main content

REDD payments as incentive for reducing forest loss

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
REDD payments as incentive for reducing forest loss
Published in
Conservation Letters, April 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00095.x
Authors

Marieke Sandker, Samuel Kofi Nyame, Johannes Förster, Neil Collier, Gill Shepherd, Daniel Yeboah, Driss Ezzine-de Blas, Miriam Machwitz, Senja Vaatainen, Efrem Garedew, Gilles Etoga, Christiane Ehringhaus, Jacob Anati, Osofo Dankama Kwasi Quarm, Bruce M. Campbell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 140 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 23%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 71 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 18%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 24 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,894,833
of 21,277,666 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#837
of 960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,833
of 253,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,277,666 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.