You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
REDD payments as incentive for reducing forest loss
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00095.x |
| Authors |
Marieke Sandker, Samuel Kofi Nyame, Johannes Förster, Neil Collier, Gill Shepherd, Daniel Yeboah, Driss Ezzine‐de Blas, Miriam Machwitz, Senja Vaatainen, Efrem Garedew, Gilles Etoga, Christiane Ehringhaus, Jacob Anati, Osofo Dankama Kwasi Quarm, Bruce M. Campbell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 24% |
| Researcher | 40 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 73 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#929
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,232
of 103,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.