↓ Skip to main content

A five-step approach for stakeholder engagement in prioritisation and planning of environmental evidence syntheses

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 186)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A five-step approach for stakeholder engagement in prioritisation and planning of environmental evidence syntheses
Published in
Environmental Evidence, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0104-0
Authors

Magnus Land, Biljana Macura, Claes Bernes, Sif Johansson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 24%
Unspecified 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Other 8 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#742,941
of 13,594,282 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#31
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,103
of 316,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,594,282 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.