↓ Skip to main content

An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2005
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-5-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy L Wilczynski, Douglas Morgan, R Brian Haynes, the Hedges Team

Abstract

With the information explosion, the retrieval of the best clinical evidence from large, general purpose, bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE can be difficult. Both researchers conducting systematic reviews and clinicians faced with a patient care question are confronted with the daunting task of searching for the best medical literature in electronic databases. Many have advocated the use of search filters or "hedges" to assist with the searching process. The purpose of this report is to describe the design and methods of a study that set out to develop optimal search strategies for retrieving sound clinical studies of health disorders in large electronics databases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 5%
Spain 2 2%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Saudi Arabia 1 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 70 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 15 18%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 41%
Computer Science 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,009,265
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#692
of 2,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,229
of 56,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,001 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.