Title |
An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2005
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-5-20 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nancy L Wilczynski, Douglas Morgan, R Brian Haynes, the Hedges Team |
Abstract |
With the information explosion, the retrieval of the best clinical evidence from large, general purpose, bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE can be difficult. Both researchers conducting systematic reviews and clinicians faced with a patient care question are confronted with the daunting task of searching for the best medical literature in electronic databases. Many have advocated the use of search filters or "hedges" to assist with the searching process. The purpose of this report is to describe the design and methods of a study that set out to develop optimal search strategies for retrieving sound clinical studies of health disorders in large electronics databases. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 5% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Greece | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 15 | 18% |
Researcher | 13 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 23% |
Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 41% |
Computer Science | 11 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 17 | 21% |